<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Creative Commons &#187; consultation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://creativecommons.org/tag/consultation/feed/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://creativecommons.org</link>
	<description>Share, reuse, and remix — legally.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:34:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Clarifications about CC BY in the UK Open Access&#160;Policy</title>
		<link>http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/36572</link>
		<comments>http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/36572#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Vollmer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCUK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://creativecommons.org/?p=36572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the UK, the House of Commons has asked for feedback on their Open Access Policy. One provision of that policy requires that articles funded through the Research Councils UK (RCUK) must be released under a CC BY license. Last year, CC submitted a short comment in support. And just last month, the House of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the UK, the House of Commons <a href="http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/business-innovation-and-skills/news/committee-announces-an-inquiry-into-open-access/">has asked for feedback</a> on their Open Access Policy. One provision of that policy requires that articles funded through the Research Councils UK (RCUK) must be released under a CC BY license. Last year, CC submitted a <a href="http://wiki.creativecommons.org/RCUK_comments">short comment</a> in support. </p>
<p>And just last month, the House of Lords completed a consultation period which has <a href="http://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-committees/science-technology/Openaccess/OpenAccessevidence.pdf">generated some misinformation</a> about how the CC BY license operates. So, in order to clarify some of these misconceptions, Creative Commons and <a href="http://www.creativecommons.org.uk/">Creative Commons UK</a> submitted a joint response to the Business, Innovation and Skills Committee to set the record straight. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve <a href="http://wiki.creativecommons.org/BIS_committee_UK_OA_Policy">pulled together some clarifications</a> to some of the uncertainty lobbed at the CC BY license provision in the Open Access Policy. Some of the reasons given that CC BY should not be retained include:</p>
<ul>
<li>it would promote &#8220;misuse of research or would cause authors to &#8220;lose control of their work&#8221;</li>
<li>third party rights negotiations for content that authors wish to include within an openly licensed article would prove too difficult</li>
<li>open licensing provides less protection against plagiarism</li>
<li>CC BY is not widely used in OA publishing</li>
<li>authors should choose licensing conditions, not funders</li>
</ul>
<p>These claims are confusing, misguided, or not backed up by evidence. We offer our responses and support <a href="http://wiki.creativecommons.org/BIS_committee_UK_OA_Policy">here</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/36572/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Commission wants to hear from you on &#8220;Opening Up&#160;Education&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/33832</link>
		<comments>http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/33832#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Vollmer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opening up education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[questionnaire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://creativecommons.org/?p=33832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" about="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tiseb/4592786358/"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tiseb/4592786358/"><img src="http://creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/4592786358_947e161e05.jpeg"" alt="European Commission flags"/ /></a><br /><small><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tiseb/4592786358/"><span property="dc:title">European Commission</span></a> / <span property="cc:attributionName">tiseb</span> / <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">CC BY</a></small></p>
<p>The European Commission has opened a <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/consult/open_en.htm ">public consultation period</a> on the topic of &#8220;Opening Up Education.&#8221; The objective of the consultation is to explore the perceived need for EU action to promote the use of Open Educational Resources (OER) and of Information Communication Technologies (ICT) in education. Interested stakeholders (including organizations, public bodies, citizens) can complete the <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/ipm/forms/dispatch?form=OpeningUpEducation">questionnaire on this consultation</a>. </p>
<p>From the <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/documents/consult/open_en.pdf">summary document</a> (PDF): </p>
<blockquote><p>While OER and the use of ICT in education are high on the agenda of policy makers in the educational sphere, OER and ICT have not yet reached a critical threshold to be fully exploited across all education and training sectors. Several actions have been undertaken over the years by the EU and Member States, but in a fragmented, short-term manner, without prospects for long-term sustainability. A comprehensive initiative at EU level could match the scope, size and complexity of the challenges, and respond to the increasing demand to tap into the potential of OER and ICT to modernize education. Such a strategy could provide a significant push to improve the way educational content is produced, accessed and used to teach, learn or connect with peers.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The consultation period ends 13 November 2012. Following on from the <a href="http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/events/calendar-of-events/events-websites/World-Open-Educational-Resources-Congress">June 2012 UNESCO OER Declaration</a>, the EU consultation can be a productive vehicle for continuing the exploration of and support for Open Education in Europe and around the world. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/33832/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
