<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Creative Commons &#187; H.R. 1464</title>
	<atom:link href="http://creativecommons.org/tag/hr-1464/feed/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://creativecommons.org</link>
	<description>Share, reuse, and remix — legally.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:58:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>H.R. 1464 — The &#8220;OER&#160;Bill&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/13669</link>
		<comments>http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/13669#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Park</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ccLearn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H.R. 1464]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OER bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open textbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativecommons.org/?p=13669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The open educational resources movement has been picking up steam lately, even attracting the attention of legislators. What&#8217;s hot in the new Persian year (aka the start of spring) is the recently introduced &#8220;OER Bill&#8220;. What&#8217;s that, you say? Well in its own words, it&#8217;s a bill &#8220;To require Federal agencies to collaborate in the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The open educational resources movement has been picking up steam lately, even attracting the attention of legislators. What&#8217;s hot in the new Persian year (aka the start of spring) is the recently introduced &#8220;<a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-1464">OER Bill</a>&#8220;. What&#8217;s that, you say?</p>
<p>Well in its own words, it&#8217;s a bill &#8220;To require Federal agencies to collaborate in the development of freely-available open source educational materials in college-level physics, chemistry, and math, and for other purposes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Like <a href="http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/807">David Wiley</a>, we also don&#8217;t quite <em>trust our eyes</em>. (<em>Italics</em> don&#8217;t really do it justice either.)</p>
<p>Read further, and you&#8217;ll see that the bill requires all federal agencies expending more than  $10,000,000 a year on scientific education and outreach to &#8220;use at least 2 percent of such funds for the collaboration on the development and implementation of open source materials as an educational outreach effort in accordance with subsection.&#8221;</p>
<p>The bill also complains a great deal about the cost of closed (versus open) textbooks. This is an undeniable fact that might finally get recognized by Congress. <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-1464">Read the full bill now</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/13669/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
