<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Creative Commons &#187; Olympics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://creativecommons.org/tag/olympics/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://creativecommons.org</link>
	<description>Share, reuse, and remix — legally.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:58:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CC licensed photos and the International Olympic&#160;Committee</title>
		<link>http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/18364</link>
		<comments>http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/18364#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CC BY-NC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CC BY-SA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativecommons.org/?p=18364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weezie&#8217;s Birthday Ballooning by Richard Giles / CC BY-SA Richard Giles, a social media specialist in Australia who frequently posts and CC licenses photos on Flickr, received a threatening letter from the International Olympic Committee last week, mentioning a set of photos he had taken at the 2008 games in Beijing. Giles posted a rundown [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div about="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2462/3613705218_aae4ca0477.jpg" xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" style="text-align:center; padding:10px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/richardgiles/3613705218/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2462/3613705218_aae4ca0477.jpg" style="border: medium none ;"/></a><br /><small><em><span property="dc:title">Weezie&#8217;s Birthday Ballooning</span></em> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/richardgiles/3613705218" rel="cc:attributionURL" property="cc:attributionName">Richard Giles</a> / <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/">CC BY-SA</a></small></div>
<p>Richard Giles, a social media specialist in Australia who frequently <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/richardgiles/">posts and CC licenses photos on Flickr</a>, received a <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/richardgiles/3988389213/">threatening letter</a> from the International Olympic Committee last week, mentioning a <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/richardgiles/sets/72157606780890410">set of photos he had taken at the 2008 games in Beijing</a>.</p>
<p>Giles posted a <a href="http://richardgiles.com/2009/10/09/the-olympics-and-creative-commons-photographs/">rundown of the story so far</a> on his blog. It is not clear the situation is resolved yet, and initially there was confusion about which photos or licenses are at issue, but there are many worthwhile posts about it to check out, including these:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.digital-rights.net/?p=2747">Olympics threaten photographer</a> by Mathias Klang (of CC Sweden), who points out in passing that there are now <a href="http://flickr.com/creativecommons">over 120 million CC licensed photos</a> on Flickr &#8212; a 20% increase in <a href="http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/13588">6 months</a>.
</li>
<li><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091008/0252066460.shtml">Go To The Olympics? Take Photos? Put Them On Flickr? Await Olympic Committee Legal Threat Letter</a> on Techdirt by Mike Masnick.
</li>
<li><a href="http://themoderatevoice.com/48970/international-olympic-committee-goes-copyright-trademark-crazy/">International Olympic Committee Goes Copyright (&#038; Trademark) Crazy</a> on The Moderate Voice by Joe Windish.
</li>
<li><a href="http://ragesoss.com/blog/2009/10/09/wikipedia-and-olympics-committee-heading-for-collision/">Wikipedia and Olympics Committee heading for collision?</a> by Sage Ross, who points out that Giles&#8217; photo(s) likely came to the attention of the IOC indirectly via English Wikipedia, where one of Giles&#8217; photos is currently used in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usain_Bolt">Usain Bolt</a> article.
</li>
</ul>
<p>Regarding Ross&#8217; post,  of course the UK merchant that used the photo in an advertisement that eventually attracted the IOC&#8217;s notice may have discovered the photo directly on Flickr as well. In either case, <b>the value of moving to a more liberal license if you want your works to spread is highlighted</b> &#8212; Giles&#8217; Usain Bolt photo is under CC Attribution-ShareAlike, while his other Beijing photos are under CC Attribution-NonCommercial.</p>
<p><a href="http://support.creativecommons.org/donate"><img src="http://creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/cc-shepard-fairey-logo-medium-150x150.png" alt="cc-shepard-fairey-logo-medium" title="cc-shepard-fairey-logo-medium" width="150" height="150" style="float:right; padding:10px; border:none"/></a>Whatever the resolution of this particular dispute, there&#8217;s no question that the IOC&#8217;s attempt to control how photographers use their own photos is symptomatic of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permission_culture">permission culture</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_anticommons">tragedy of the anticommons</a> we are facing. Creative Commons can&#8217;t directly influence the IOC&#8217;s policies, but we&#8217;re creating an alternative to ensure a non-gridlocked future of creativity and innovation, an alternative that offers benefits to those who participate in the commons now, and whose successes will change minds. <b><a href="http://support.creativecommons.org/donate">Please support us</a></b> &#8212; we&#8217;re in the midst of our <a href="http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/18166">2009 campaign to raise $500,000 to fund this work</a>.</p>
<p><small>The photo at the top of this post by Richard Giles is not of the Olympics, but does look fun. Note that even such an innocuous photo could be under threat as we move in the direction of a permission economy &#8212; <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/11/09/condo-ass-claims-cop.html">building owners</a> attempt to control public photography, why not balloon owners or designers? <a href="http://support.creativecommons.org/donate">Give now.</a> ☺</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/18364/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

