weblog
2003 January
edventure
Press Robot, January 10th, 2003
“Who Controls Information?, ” By Kevin Werbach.
No Comments »Cátedra Procesamiento de Datos
Press Robot, January 10th, 2003
“Creative Commons” in Spanish.
No Comments »Neural.it
Press Robot, January 10th, 2003
“Creative Commons, licenze per distribuire gratuitamente e tutelare il proprio lavoro.“
No Comments »Echoes-Online.de
Press Robot, January 10th, 2003
“Neue Rechte für neue Zeiten,” by Julian Finn.
No Comments »En.Red.Ando
Press Robot, January 10th, 2003
“Creative Commons y la profundidad del copyright,” in Spanish.
No Comments »Doctorow’s Down and Out Released Today
Glenn Otis Brown, January 9th, 2003
Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom, the first novel by blogger, cultural critic, and Electronic Frontier Foundation wonk Cory Doctorow, entered the world today. Wired’s Mark Frauenfelder calls Down and Out “the most entertaining and exciting science fiction story I’ve read in the last few years,” and Bruce Sterling declares, “Science fiction needs Cory Doctorow!”
Doctorow has published Down and Out under a Creative Commons license.
Read our interview with the author — our latest Featured Commoner.
No Comments »The Many Faces of the Music Biz
Glenn Otis Brown, January 8th, 2003
“People are always looking for what side to be on, and there isn’t just one side. . . . I think we’re looking for a kinder, gentler, more equitable model where more people can make a living off of this stuff.”
The wise words of Jenny Toomey, musician, policy wonk, and Executive Director of the Future of Music Coalition. A nice piece in Wired News sums up FMC’s brilliant, third-annual summit in Washington this week.
No Comments »“And now you’re gonna have to get . . . used to it.”
Glenn Otis Brown, January 8th, 2003
One more from today’s cosmic copyright coincidence file:
“Some of These Bootleggers, They Make Pretty Good Stuff” — a Salon piece on Bob Dylan and “the hidden industry he (unwittingly) helped create.” Thought-provoking.
No Comments »Illegal Art, Illegal Imagination
Glenn Otis Brown, January 8th, 2003
An interesting piece in the New York Times today discusses “Illegal Art: Freedom of Expression in the Corporate Age,” an exhibition dedicated to works built in part from other copyrighted works — without permission.
By sign-of-the-times coincidence, I participated in a panel yesterday entitled “The Illegal Imagination,” at the Future of Music Coalition’s superb summit in Washington D.C. Co-panelists Gigi Sohn (Public Knowledge), Siva Vaidhyathan (NYU), musician Alfonzo Blackwell, and moderator Ira Glass (This American Life) and I discussed precisely the same issues. Aided by spirited audience participation (one of the many great hallmarks of the FMC gathering), we discussed hip-hop and sampling, the ever-growing world of “mash-up” media, and copyright’s influence on creativity, generally.
“Though copyright law can make for arcane discussion,” writes the Times‘ Chris Nelson, “popular culture has brimmed with the subject of late.”
And brim it will. As readers of this blog already know, few can afford to consider copyright “arcane” for much longer. Whether you’re an artist, a fan, a coder, or a casual web-surfer, knowing the ins and outs of copyright — for better or worse — is already part of getting by in the wired world. Copyright’s not just for lawyers anymore.
–Glenn Otis Brown
No Comments »Prentice Hall to Publish Bruce Perens ‘Open Source’ Books
Glenn Otis Brown, January 7th, 2003
Innovative content licensing seems to be catching on — even beyond the efforts of Creative Commons.
Prentince Hall PTR recently announced that they’ll publish a series of technical books under open-content licenses. Read the Slashdot story.
Kudos to Bruce Perens for brokering the move, and to Prentice Hall for joining O’Reilly and Associaties in the elite club of enlightened commercial publishers.
(You’ll recall that the O’Reilly folks recently adopted our Founder’s Copyright, under which they’ll release certain copyrights into the public domain after 14 years, with an option to renew for another 14 — just as the Framers’ of the U.S. Constitution would have had it.)
No Comments »Search
Subscribe to RSSArchives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- September 2002
